When is an indirect attack typically used?

An indirect attack is typically employed for large, out-of-control, or difficult-to-reach fires because it allows firefighters to create controlled burns or establish fire lines some distance away from the main fire front. This method is particularly effective when direct engagement with the fire might be too dangerous or impractical due to factors such as extreme heat, rapid fire spread, or difficult terrain. By removing fuel from the fire's path or using natural barriers, firefighters can manage the fire's spread and protect nearby structures or resources.

In contrast, smaller, manageable wildland fires are usually tackled with direct attack strategies that allow for quicker suppression. When a fire is directly threatening a structure, the priority often shifts to getting as close to the fire as safely possible to defend the structure, which again favors direct attack strategies. Finally, wait until a fire is completely extinguished to consider an indirect attack is counter-intuitive, as the indirect attack is about strategic management rather than waiting for complete control. Therefore, the context of larger and more complex fire scenarios aligns well with the use of an indirect attack.